They started showing up as part of tender conditions for general contractors.
BIM requirements – put up by owners’ reps guided by specialist consultants.
Some are quite good. Good and ambitious.
Actually, I’m pretending here. We are doomed!
I mostly skimmed over the collection of ‘BIM requirements’ that came across my desk recently despite of multiple attempts to thoroughly read through it.
Excuse my arrogance, but there is a lot of nonsense in there L
Now, I have seen plenty of specifications in my lifetime and the NZ Masterspec, that I was inclined to work with for many years tended to err on the wordier side (sometime writing too much to cover everything) – but I can say with certainty that I’ve never in the last 25 years come across a specification describing any type of tender condition (trade related or otherwise) that was so far off the mark.
Can I think of a possible equivalents?
Say, asking the concrete placer to use toothbrushes to clean up at completion.
Painters to poor pure melted gold in their mixture.
Site canteens to serve 5 star hotel rated meals and main contractors to offer relaxing massages to their employees twice-a-day.
Site canteens to serve 5 star hotel rated meals and main contractors to offer relaxing massages to their employees twice-a-day.
Actually, what disturbs me most is not that their conditions are ambitious or even unreasonable.
Frankly, some of them are poor gobbledygook. (I’ll look into these in the future)
Well, look at what the Norwegian government building agency (Norways largest building owner)
ReplyDeleteis specifying:
http://www.buildingsmart.no/sites/default/files/statsbyggbimmanual1-2publicbeta1.pdf
Love your blog!