I am a New Zealander because I chose to be.
Proud of it in spite of quite a few obvious flaws and
weaknesses.
It is a pretty little place with nice people, although it
gets a bit carried away with outrageous claims from time to time. For instance
lots of the foreigners who hear the “100% pure” can’t help cringing.
There was an article in the NZ Herald a couple of days
ago headed:
“The Land Of Bad
Milk and Fake Honey
Britain's Food
Standards Agency has issued a nationwide warning about misleading and illegal
claims made on the labels of manuka honey jars, in a worrying blow to the
fast-growing Kiwi industry. ”
Showing great timing, the same paper fired back at the
British, with a picture of a fishmonger’s display claiming ‘fresh NZ snapper’.
Joking aside; these stories all raise the same questions:
Our world is highly manipulated by the media. Are there
some words that have a higher value or weight than others? Should companies that use them lightly be held
accountable?
Words like natural, fresh, pure, honest…
When one or some of these words are used to describe a
product, do we as consumers have the right to expect a certain something in the
product? Or do natural, fresh, pure or honest depend on small print, or
interpretation?
What about the word: integrity?
If Integrity is claimed, does the world read “100%
honesty”?
Or is 40% honesty adequate at times?
very nice information thank you for posting so good post for more information click here BIM documentation in USA
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing BIM Implementation in UK
ReplyDeleteGood content keep it up BIM Implementation
ReplyDeletethanks for sharing information.....
ReplyDeleteConstruction Documentation in USA
Construction Documentation in India