I have a bit of a phobia of flowcharts. They creep me
out.
The ones that are designed to describe BIM processes are
the worst, maybe because of their impact on my day-to-day life.
On one side, I support structured approach to BIM, a
formalized graphic representation of a logic-sequence should do no harm.
However, as an Intuitive BIM-mer, I tend to focus on
results and flow-charts just don’t cut it for me. Even on a very abstract
level, they just do not reflect what I see in the real world, where activities
get all tangled up in multiple dimensions, blatantly disregard artificial rules
and generally fail to behave in a well-charted manner.
Building design stages have stopped being packaged in
distinctively separated boxes some time ago (schematic design, developed
design, detail design…) – yet are still favoured by those unable to keep up
with the changes of scenery that have been hitting the AEC over the last 2
decades.
Similarly, BIM practitioners keep promoting a neatly
compartmentalized process that BIM is – or at least should be, using colorful
flowcharts.
Is it because they have originated from the programming
and process driven manufacturing industries that no one really questions these
charts?
Or are they just safety blankets that give comfort to
those that run BIM processes, something to burrow one’s head in when the
reality hits?
I like the "Data Drop meeting prescribed detail level" anything in between is your own responsibility.
ReplyDeleteIndustry associations are not keeping up as fast as the technology. Who is to give guidance to the practitioner when the overseer is only thinking of retirement?
THANK U FOR THE POST
ReplyDeleteFOR MORE INFORMATION CLICK HERE
autocad solutions IN USA
Great content keep it up BIM Implementation in India
ReplyDeletethanks for sharing information.....
ReplyDeleteConstruction Documentation in USA
Construction Documentation in India