Why the BIM model is unlikely to replace the drawing as
the communication tool within AEC projects any time soon?
The answer is simple: It knows too much.
Giving away the digital model of a building to another
party without clear terms of reference what can be used from it and how, is
like throwing one’s mind (brain?) to someone when asked to describe an event.
They question you: ‘what happened at the party when Pete knocked
Paul over?’
You may tell your story as you remember it, in one
sentence, or ten.
That would be the equivalent of ‘traditional, drawing
based information’. You filter the information and give out what-you-want and
how-you-want it.
What if, instead, the interrogator told you – ‘well, you
were at the event, just give me your brain and we’ll scan from it all relevant
info, what you saw, what your thoughts at the time were etc...’?
Sounds scary?
No wonder then that hardly any party is volunteering to
drop the drawing and allow others to have full access to the ‘brains’ behind it.
This may change in the future, but new things will need
to develop.
An essential one: Industry wide acceptance on how to distinguish
within a model data backed by the issuing party and what is out-of-bounds.
Something flatCAD is still not managing very well, 30+
years mature.
(Image by Mahesh Kumar, modelled in Revit)
Interesting thought. On the one hand, we assume model sharing has to become an essential operation, especially with IFC and OpenBIM workflows, but on the other hand, there is a high barrier to share more than a dumb flat drawing.
ReplyDeleteTHANK U FOR THE POST
ReplyDeleteFOR MORE INFORMATION CLICK HERE
autocad solutions
Thanks for sharing BIM Implementation in UK
ReplyDeletethanks for sharing information.....
ReplyDeleteConstruction Documentation in USA
Construction Documentation in India