You decide to commission someone to write a book.
A novel, a biography, gardening book.
There are 5 stages to the process:
1. Collecting ideas
2. Drafting, clarifying;
3. Revising, defining, detailing;
4. Editing, proofreading;
5. Publishing
The process unfolds as expected, with ups-and-downs....
At the end, you have the book.
A bit later than expected, a bit more expensive than expected, nevertheless, a book.
In a similar situation:
You decide to commission someone to create a building.
A house, a school, a town hall.
There are 5 stages to this process, named differently but not too dissimilar to creating a novel.
This process turns out to be quite different...
Stages one to four: gobbledygook, finishing stage: finger pointing, hand-wringing and anguish.
At the end, most of the time, you end up with a building.
A bit later than expected, a bit more expensive than expected, nevertheless, a building.
So, anything to worry about?
You fund parties to produce waffle through 4/5ths of the process.
In the past, rising building ‘values’ made this process tolerable.
The bubble burst, the figures no longer work;
Not convinced? Have a look at the sample reports I linked in; 2 projects, a stage 5 and a stage 2;
Both are woefully under documented, full of gibberish.
Why did the clients tolerate this? Were there fully aware of this happening?
No comments:
Post a Comment