I am a manager of construction information, tools and people .
I believe that hands-on manipulating of project information by all project participants is the key to achieving any meaningful improvement of the AEC industry operating within the post-gambling-era.
I consider myself to be a model-based construction information practitioner (shortened to a ‘BIM- meddler’) rather than an ‘expert’ or even ‘specialist’.
Friday, November 21, 2014
A double whammy… striving first to become a really good architect, then a really good BIM-mer…
A couple of days ago, I was sitting in a pretty ordinary
design meeting at my pretty ordinary (non BIM) job where the main topic was slagging off the
non-present architect of the project by the lead (specialist) designer.
I knew better than try to counter the clever jokes of ‘what
architects are good for...’ and did not
visibly flinch at the comment of ‘we let them design the colour of the toilets…’
Still the little interlude had me think about how seriously the industry misunderstands
the role/job/responsibility of the ‘real’ architect. Followed by the thought
that ‘real’ architects do rarely exist anymore, so the question is irrelevant
any more… and what an earth was I thinking when I chose that as my profession
some 30 years ago.
Even worse, why did I strive to become good at it in the
true meaning of the term and pursue that idea for decades through thick and
thin… mostly the latter.
Now, add to this of almost the same length of time of
investing in becoming a good BIMmer (an architect with a more contemporary
toolset) and I do have to wonder – will I ever learn?
So, with these sorts of things occupying my mind – it was
a nice coincidence to be approached by a friend with a suggestion for a blogpost.
Djordje writes about a particular event that I was also a
guest of, but also tackles the bigger picture of the lost (idealised) role of
the architect and their future if there is still such a thing for them. (us?)
All that within a context of a pretty exclusive BIM
gathering that had despite of being cool and fancy managed to avoid the real
questions, but delivered at least one snazzy speaker that I enjoyed too.
So, please welcome my first guest blogger:
The importance of Johnny
Almost six months ago, I have had the
pleasure of attending a by invitation only conference organized by the makers
of my professional software of choice. I will be conceited enough not to
mention the company or the software, as I do think that most of the BIMsphere
would know which ones am I talking about. Those that don't, can skip the rest.
This conference was important to me on a
few levels. I got to go to a place that I love, but have not been to in nine
years. I was to meet a lot of people that I have worked, fought, cooperated and
became friends with, sharing a common passion. Even better, I was to meet in
person quite a few people with whom I worked, became friends, and knew
virtually for quite a few years, some of them even a decade or more! And,
looking through the list of the speakers, there were quite a few great topics,
and quite a few speakers that I really wanted to see and hear.
So, the day came … I have landed before
dawn on the day of the conference registration, spent the day just breathing in
the city and the weather, and kept bumping into people that I knew, and “knew”.
The better part of the afternoon was spent in “oh, I know you!” moments after
reading the name tags. And the cakes, of course …
Others have described the conference in
more detail, and yes, it was everything I have thought it would be, except next
time I will get a cheaper accommodation … and those three days went past
quickly. The air was heavy with the passion for the product, the solutions and
their implementation, that ranged from single homes to city districts. Everyone
was playing the same song, in their own way – these tools enable us to do
The reason why I am writing this is the
only guy that came from reality. Not from, arguably the best, solution nirvana.
Johnny the Emperor. An American architect, award winning, incredible salesman,
even more incredible presenter, classic car collector, that does not practice
architecture, and did not mention the product, or the solutions, once. Wait,
what? What he DID do is bring the reality crashing in. With the thumb and index
fingers of his right hand an inch apart, and the left hand stretched as far as
possible, he illustrated what is the part of the cake that the architects get
(the right hand) and what is the rest. And he does it all – develops properties
that he designs and builds, and then sells or rents. Or lives in.
That gentleman is an architect in the true
meaning of the word. He contemplates, and does the building. He is not letting
the flotsam of the construction industry eat away the fruits of his labour. He
does what an architect should do: imagines a building and creates it. And then
parks his collection of Porsche 356s in the ground floor – sorry, first floor,
we are in the US of A. Not that we have heard what happened between the Rambler
with the UHaul trailer and the 356s, but that's probably a topic for another
Most of the attendees asked themselves why
did he come at all. Self promotion? To spread professional insults? To degrade
the holy profession that allows us to float by the powers of our imagination
and create the built environment? Some were even offended. Frankly, I asked
myself at the first moment some of these questions, and discussed it with the
people sitting around me. While he did stick out of the prevailing software
solution nirvana, like a proverbial sore thumb, his hand gesture illustration
was the illustration of the reality, and the truth. It probably helped that for
the most, if not all of my professional life I have worked in the design and
build environment, and have actually never practised “pure” architecture. You
know the kind, when your responsibilities stop after the design is approved and
the contractor comes in.
As does your income, while others', at a
magnitude of order larger, is just starting to flow.
So, did Johnny the Emperor – as he has said
his family and his team call him – come to the conference as a showman, or an
example of something that an architect should not be, or as an example of what
an architect should be? As the time passes, I do believe that the latter is the
case. He did bring in a dose of reality, hardcore profit making attitude, while
never actually straying from the path of architecture and the solutions that
his team uses to create it. You don't have to mention it or sing praises. You
don't even have to be liked by the audience. You only have to tell what you are
there to tell: that architects should finally take their destiny in their own
hands, and yes, there are those wonderful tools and solutions that have been
around for three decades and still people hear about them for the first time,
and that the cake is very, very large. He does not want to pick the crumbles
off the plate, he eats the cake.
As should we all.
If nothing else, that was the reason he
should have been where he has been, and the lesson we should have learned.